Did the decontamination of Ground Zero prevent cancer?
The answer is correct. Thank you.
Unfortunately the answer is incorrect.
3 Radioactivity
The hypothesis of the nuclear destruction
process with neutron collimator COMPLETES the theory of
William Tahil
It takes into account the statistical changes of the isotope signature caused by another interaction with neutrons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTICE
Thousands of first responders in New York have been exposed to deadly radiation over the years.
Please consider making a donation for the increasing number of 9/11 cancer and radiation victims in New York.
-
Click here for more information:
www.fealgoodfoundation.com
EXTERNAL LINK: (NOTE: we assume no liability for the contents)
Decay chain of barium 143 and strontium 93
With the exception of the slightly radioactive zirconium, all primary fission products decay within a few days.
Isotopes of the primary fission products however might have longer half lives.
Source 1 (modified): http://www.nucleardemolition.com/
Source
2 (half lives): http://www.internetchemie.info/chemiewiki/index.php?title=Barium-Isotope
3.1 Checking the facts
3.2 Summary
Radioactive experiments with their own civil population are not unusual for US powerholders.
Between 1945 and 1960, approximately 300,000 soldiers and civilians were exposed to radiation effects
|
KILLING OUR OWN: The Disaster of America’s Experience with Atomic Radiation Source: www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO.pdf Local copy: pdfs/Killing_Our_Own.pdf |
 |
Photo (right): Borax Sedan; 104 kt, ignition in –194 m
Source 1: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1exp10.html
Source
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_(nuclear_test)
Source: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_%28Kernwaffentest%29
“A considerable part of the US population (about 7 percent, that was equal to approx. 13 million people in 1962) was contaminated due to Sedan.
Just about 2 percent of the released radiation ended up in the mushroom cloud, the rest either fell back directly into the crater or onto the ground within spitting distance.
Nevertheless, (minor) radioactive fallout was still measured months after the event between Sedan and the vicinity of Chicago.”
3.2.1 Previous knowledge of the CIA / blackmailing the coalition
The expected use of miniature thermonuclear weapons in New York
Before 9/11 former CIA employee Susan Lindauer was involved in the peace contract negotiations with representatives of the Iraq government.
In late summer of 2001 she got a personal warning by her superior Richard Fuisz: an urgent recommendation not to travel to New York because an attack with a thermonuclear weapon was expected.
Source @25’:30’’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJPwW1ryOI
Richard Fuisz warning Susan Lindauer
“Do not go back to New York City. It’s too dangerous.
We are expecting the use of a miniature thermonuclear device.”
Susan Lindauer
“And they were not afraid that I was going to be hurt by [by] falling debris in the World Trade Center. I wasn’t going to be in the World Trade Center.
They were afraid of radiation contamination.”
9/11 comprises two mysteries for the masses: |
 |
? Giulietto Chiesa ? (EU parliament member 2004 - 2009)
“At a meeting taking place after the September 11 attacks a US general gave a speech. Suddenly he said that in reality Osama bin Laden was in possession of about 15 small nuclear weapons – and that he had already used them.
He then played back a video showing a gigantic mushroom cloud rising above New York that we watched flabbergasted.
The general then urged us to understand how important it was to build a ‘Coalition of the willing’: only together we could take action against Osama bin Laden to avoid mushroom clouds developing above European cities .
Asked whether we could make this video available for the public, the general denied our question: this was classified information.”
Source: youtube.com; Link missing
Not
to be referenced as source: http://www.voltairenet.org/article30048.html
3.2.2 Radioactive fallout and decay values
The large part of the dust particles was blown out to the sea, as a consequence the fallout in New York was relatively low.
-
uranium, mean concentration 3.29 ppm
-
thorium, mean concentration 9.31 ppm
The USGS detected two always radioactive elements in the WTC dust samples:
Copy (page 6): www.911history.de/pdfs/World Trade Center USGS Chemistry Table.pdf
Direct
access: pdfs/World Trade Center USGS Chemistry Table.pdf
Dust cloud of the World Trade Center, NEXRAD radar image
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:New_York_September_11_NEXRAD.png
Direct
file: images_oversized/ESS_USGS_map_overview_911nn040_grid_en.jpg
The uranium "fingerprint" of a nuclear weapon; Example: Little Boy Bomb
“The 16 kiloton yield of the Little Boy bomb was produced by the fission of 0.91 kg of uranium-235, out of the 64 kg in the pit.
The remaining 63 kg, 98.5% of the total, contributed nothing to the energy yield.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy
-
uranium must be present in the dust
-
thorium (formed by uranium alpha-decay) must be present in the dust
As an uranium fission bomb disintegrates before the nuclear fuel can be fully consumed:
Source 1: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=92&n=143
Source
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy
1. Conventional explosive
2. Hollow uranium 25.6 kg "bullet"
3. Gun barrel
4. Uranium cylinder 38.4 kg "target"
Both expected elements are present: Copy: www.911history.de/pdfs/USGS_Leachate_Table_Uran_Zerfallskette.pdf Source (direct access): pdfs/USGS_Leachate_Table_Uran_Zerfallskette.pdf No analysis of specific isotopes were published by the USGS |
|
An first, playful estimation
-
mean concentration of uranium in ppm: 3.29
-
estimated quantity of dust per square metre: 0.1 kg
-
estimated area covered by dust: 10%
On basis of the USGS dust sample analysis we can made a first estimation of the total mass of the unconsumed uranium:
The result of total [radioactive] uranium is 1.9 kg.
The real values could be significantly higher due to dust particles blown over the sea.
Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
Local
copy (page 6): www.911history.de/pdfs/World Trade Center USGS Chemistry Table.pdf
-
Lanthanum, mean concentration 45.96 ppm [total estimated: 27.1 kg]
could partly come from other sources as: http://periodic.lanl.gov/57.shtml
-
Cerium, mean concentration 91.23 ppm [total estimated: 53.9 kg]
could partly come from other sources as: http://periodic.lanl.gov/58.shtml
-
Yttrium, mean concentration 57.45 ppm [total estimated: 33.8 kg]
could partly come from other sources as: http://periodic.lanl.gov/39.shtml
-
Zirconium was present, but was listed only in the leach table analysis
could partly come from other sources as: http://periodic.lanl.gov/40.shtml
-
Niobium, mean concentration 8.34 ppm [total estimated: 4.9 kg]
could partly come from other sources as: http://periodic.lanl.gov/41.shtml
The USGS dust sample analysis did detect elements, which are usually created as a result of radioactive decay, after uranium fission (and which are radioactive in this case):
Fallout and pyroclastic flow
Source: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/911/images/lg-map-aerial1.jpg
Significant decrease of radioactivity within a short time
Source (modified): http://nucleardemolition.com/
How to detect radioactivity with a camera
3.2.3 Enclosure of radiation and decontamination
Ground Zero was covered with fresh loads of earth at regular intervals, the fills were removed and replaced after regularly.
Water vapor rose still many months after the attack through the earth fills.
Source: https://www.facebook.com/911nucleardemolition/photos_stream?tab=photos_stream
Water sprayers fighting high temperature debris
These sprayers were also used to cool the high temperature debris before it left the site.
Several trucks were returned to the site for additional cooling because the law enforcement officers would not let them through the tunnels leaving Manhattan until they stopped steaming.
Source: http://911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_Hot_Spots
Decontamination works on Ground Zero were carried out by workers wearing full protective suits.
3.2.4 Stable iron isotopes
Stability of iron
In terms of nuclear physics, iron is the most stable element and is difficult to make radioactive even when exposed to strong neutron radiation.
Source (modified): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation
Isotopes
A lot of iron isotopes do not provoke a signal in the Geiger counter.
This applies for Fe-54, Fe-56, Fe-57 and Fe-58.
Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/
Neutron bombardment: how radioactive isotopes develop
Radioactive isotopes can develop when a stable element absorbs one or more neutrons as nuclear components while being bombarded with neutrons.
Effective cross section
“The effectiveness of the neutron bombardment per area unit is described by the effective cross section, on a circle: σ = πr2”
Source: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/crosec.html
3.2.5 Neutron scattering on iron
Effective cross section of iron
Iron has outstanding properties to scatter fast neutrons.
Fast neutrons are rather scattered by iron and not absorbed. A new [and destructive] radiation mix develops in the process.
Effective cross section of water / hydrogen
Hydrogen (H-1) also has very good properties to scatter slow and fast neutrons.
The most important harmful effect of neutron radiation in living tissue is the elastic scattering on hydrogen H-1 (effect of a neutron bomb).
This property also allows the use of water as neutron moderator in nuclear reactors.
Massive scattering for slow and fast neutrons by iron
-
The scattering power of Fe-56 for slow neutrons is already 50% of the scattering power of hydrogen H-1! [barn 10 : barn 20]
-
The scattering power of Fe-56 for fast neutrons is already 500% of the scattering power of hydrogen H-1! [barn 20 : barn 4]
A look on the table with the effective cross sections of FE-56 shows that iron has outstanding characteristics to scatter neutrons:
In nuclear reactors, water is used as moderator for neutrons (scattering on proton H-1)
Scattering of neutrons on hydrogen and on the water molecule
3.2.6 Radionuclides in element analysis
Step 1: Fission
-
143barium
-
93strontium
The element 235uranium decays in an induced chain reaction most likely into:
Probabilities of uranium splitting into two light atomic nuclei
Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=26&n=30.
Step 2: Searching the radioactive decay chain after uranium fission
The "finger print" of a nuclear weapon: a certain mixture of radioactive elements
When set off, every nuclear weapon produces a characteristic mixture of radioactive elements that is based on the subsequent processes of disintegration.
Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=26&n=30
Example
Radioactive β decay of strontium93 after uranium fission
Source (modified): http://www.nucleardemolition.com/
Step 3: Collecting evidence
A few days after September 11 the USGS collected and analyzed dust samples from about 40 different locations.
Sampling points
Source (edited): http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/index.html#Sampling
DOWNLOAD the svg
file: www.911memorial4kids.org/svg/911nn040_en.svg
Step 4: Analysis
Analysis 1: official results; search terms: "Lanthanum", "Cerium"
The "nuclear finger print" for barium exists.
Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/leach1/WTCleachtable.html
Analysis 2: official results; search terms: "yttrium", "zirconium", "niobium"
The "nuclear finger print" for strontium exists.
Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/leach1/WTCleachtable.html
3.2.7 Neutron activation
“The analyses do not take into account that the statistical distribution of the fission products may change due to rescattering of neutrons: for ex. a shift from strontium-90 to strontium-91”
3.2.7.1 Neutron activation: example carbon
Carbon is a component of organic life, it is usually not radioactive.
-
under the influence of neutron scattering, carbon absorbs a neutron as additional nuclear component and becomes radioactive (transition from 13C to 14C)
3.2.7.2 Neutron activation: Example strontium-90
The isotopes resulting from uranium fission develop with a certain probability.
-
strontium -92 / -93 / -94 and -95 develops with a high probability (1 – 4%)
-
strontium-90 develops with a moderate probability (0.074 %)
Probability of the formation of strontium isotopes
Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/
Half-life of strontium isotopes
-
Half-life strontium -92 / -93 / -94 and -95: a few minutes / seconds
-
Half-life strontium-90: approx. 30 years (many years are detectable)
The radioactivity of strontium isotopes resulting from uranium fission differs:
3.2.7.3 Potential absorption of other neutrons by already radioactive isotopes
Under laboratory conditions the resulting statistical distribution of radioactive isotopes can be predicted precisely, just like during an uranium fission.
-
Example: if strontium-90 absorbs another neutron, its half-life decreases from approx. 30 years to approx. 10 hours (strontium-91)
It is however impossible to predict how this statistical distribution will change due to rescattered neutron radiation:
Situation: few millionths of a second after the ignition of the nuclear weapon
Source: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/
1. Probability distribution of isotopes after uranium fission (lab)
2. Rescattered neutron radiation
3. Center of explosion with the isotopes
4. Potential transition of strontium-90 to strontium-91 after absorbing a neutron
3.2.7.4 Principle of neutron interaction
-
the addition of other metals in the nuclear weapon
-
the use of a pulsed reactor run overcritically (if any)
In his “Ground Zero Report”, William Tahil describes the possibility of an extremely high additional neutron flow due to:
Report: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report0.pdf
Photo: mobile nuclear weapon with 10 t TNT equivalent (without intensified neutron flux)
Source 1; photo on the left: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_%28nuclear_device%29
Source
2 (page 29); drawing at the center: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report0.pdf
Source
3, drawing on the right: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernwaffentechnik#Neutronenwaffe
1. Casing of the ERB bomb
2. Nuclear fission explosive charge
3. Metal additives
4. Additional nuclear explosive charge (inexistent in the case of the Davy Crockett showh here)
Change of the isotope distribution
William Tahil’s approach primarily shows that multiple rescattering of neutrons may change the statistical distribution of fission products due to neutron rescattering.
The discussion about which elements actually had an effect on the nuclear processes – wanted or unwanted – is however pure speculation.
Prior to carrying out such an analysis, the rockbed below Ground Zero underneath the memorial pools must be examined for radionuclides.
Use of a pulsed run supercritically (according to William Tahil)
-
Type of injury Rodriguez’s co-worker had
-
blue luminous effects in WTC 6
-
burning cars at WTC 2
-
Liquid steel flowing out at WTC 2 just before the destruction
If a small experimental reactor really was present in the WTC, the phenomena observed before the collapse could be explained alternatively:
Video clipping from ’Burning cars near WTC 2 Before the towers fell’
3.2.8 The cancer victims of 9/11
by the end of 2016
-
> 2,000 people dying of 9/11-related diseases
Source 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhVQ5lbzwCQ
Source 2: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/11/9-11-illnesses-death-toll -
> 5,400 people currently suffering from cancer
Source: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1614850/ -
> 37,000 people critically ill
Source: http://www.911healthnow.org/911healthnow/Home.html -
> 72,000 people in medical care
Source: http://www.renew911health.org/
Hypothetical radiation exposure on September 11, 2001
-
A rescue team member works 10 hours on this day
-
Amount of radiation at 40 mSv / h: Total amount = 0.4 Sv on this day
Model calculation for “radiation sickness”
Source (modified): http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/mushrooming.html
Hypothetical radiation exposure as of September 21, 2001
-
A responder works 8 hours a day, 200 days per year
-
Amount of radiation at 1 mSv / h: Total amount = 1.6 Sv per year
Model calculation for light radiation sickness:
Source (600% factor after reduction: 25%): http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/wtc/images/wtc-photo.jpg
Kyle Kulinski: The Gulf War Symptoms of 9/11
Source @00’:58’’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9p4knPmXYc
Impact of the radioactive hot spots: Gulf war syndrome
Source 1: http://www.renew911health.org/
Source
2: http://911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_Hot_Spots
-
Shivering, insomnia, fever, ague, feeling hot and cold at the same time, diarrhea, vomiting, skin hemorrhages and intestinal bleeding, eczema, headaches, anxiety states, etc.
Range of symptoms 1 (containable with NEW drugs)
-
Leukemia, organ and bone cancer, tumors
Range of symptoms 2 (partly operable, mostly fatal)
-
Inherited defects, miscarriages, dysplasia
Range of symptoms 3 (terminal):
Entering the cauldron
Source: http://www.abidemiracles.com/images/terrorism/911nukes/010915wtc2subbasemt.jpg
Impact of other substances: Asbestos and toxic vapors
There are additional cancers in New York caused by asbestos dust.
Asbestos acts mechanically as carcinogen – by constantly irritating the pulmonary alveoli and thus causes cancer.
renew911health.org: The Act
Interview with John Devlin
“JD@02:45: So the compensation is not just for me, the compensation for my family [...].
What about my kids, what about the other responders’ kids? If I had all this toxicity on me and I wake up with cancer eight or ten years later, do I get my kids sick?”
Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQL9CAlGSow
Previous knowledge of authorities: FEMA report 1997
The FEMA report issued in August 1997 already pointed out that the WTC might be the target of potential attacks.
It also warns of the consequences of highly carcinogenic radioactive radiation.
Source (page 11 / page 15; FEMA): https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Photocopy/189722NCJRS.pdf
Estimated
number of unregistered cancer victims: http://edition.presstv.ir/detail.fa/359423.html
3.3 Photo gallery
Source 1: https://www.facebook.com/911nucleardemolition/photos_stream?tab=photos_stream
Source 2: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/index.html
3.4 References
 |
9/11 first responders are getting sick and dying from cancer at an unusually high rate, but their illnesses are not covered by the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. At first they excluded Cancer from the bill. @ 00:23: story of John McNamara; died August 9, 2009, colon cancer @ 05:22: story of Greg Quibell; died August 27, 2008, leukemia @ 15:38: story of John Devlin (FDNY); diagnosed with throat cancer @ 21:08: story of Jeff Strohlein (FDNY); diagnosed with brain cancer ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHZMPV4ijxk |
 |
Abby Martin talks to John Feal, founder and president of the Feal Good Foundation. @ 00:45: John Feal talks about the different wave of cancers.
ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyK9R76qwm4 |
 |
The nuclear war zone of the World Trade Center on 9/11. @ 01:36: firefighters in the smoke (at 11 a.m.) @ 02:18: paper and printing in good condition on top of steel powder @ 04:08: new explosion triggered in the background @ 04:16: direct view of the results of the muzzle flash (out of the earth) @ 06:07: the towers as steel powder in the street, engine 59 driving by, with a dust trail behind ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEaD5xieg3o |
 |
Decontamination of trucks and streets. @ 01:11: extensive cleaning / decontamination of a truck @ 01:58: extensive cleaning / decontamination of the street and vehicles @ 03:28: checkpoints and documentation of decontamination ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H01ajvw9Dos |
 |
The nuclear war zone of the World Trade Center on 9/11. @ 04:16: soldiers of the National Guard in filter masks @ 05:45: workers of the Nation Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) putting on protection suits ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8MrbwKKLJM |
 |
The Nation Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) at work during the massive radiological decontamination effort at Ground Zero. @ 01:13: members of the NNSA with full protection next to normal construction workers without any protection against radiation ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsu-qGeEJro |
 |
Kyle Kulinski on Secular Talk exposes the hypocrisy of the the government which would prefer to exclude cancer from the bill (Zadroga Act), just leaving the first responders to die. @ 00:08: in memory of the cancer victims of 9/11 @ 00:58: the epedemic of cancer in southern Manhattan @ 01:42: like the gulf war symptoms [depleted uranium] @ 01:55: congress at firsts blocked the bill @ 02:38: taking the first responders to Cuba to force congress to pass the bill @ 04:16: do you have any idea what it takes to do what they did? ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJf3-cpHmxw |
 |
Intact paper and steel dust. @ 00:50: the first responders walking into the radioactive pit @ 01:11: a line of first responders walking towards Ground Zero ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpDBWWnnkk0 |
 |
Dimitri Khalezov explains the nuclear destruction with easy to understand scetches as well as the cause of the different cancer waves. @ 1:48:45: "when we talked about the so called safe distance for detonating a 150 kt nuclear charge it was ... 500 metres." ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=petmmuY2rL0 |
 |
On November 10, 2001 President Bush told the United Nations:. @ 18:58: "We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty." @ 23:22: "We have no other choice, because there is no other peace. We did not ask for this mission. Yet there is honor in history’s call." ShortClip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFnltGy-XeI |